WebThe Law of Nuisance and Overlooking – the Tate Gallery “Peeping” Litigation 20 Apr The Court of Appeal has recently passed down its judgement in the case of Fearn v Tate Gallery [2024]. The owners of luxury flats, adjacent to the Tate Gallery were the claimants. WebGiles Duncan Fearn; Gerald Kraftman; Ian McFadyen; Helen Claire McFayden; Lindsay Urquhart (Appellants) v The Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery (Respondent) [2024] …

Fearn v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery - Case Summary

WebThe High Court found in favour of the Tate Modern and held there was no actionable nuisance. It found the flat’s design caused the nuisance, and the tenants could take … WebJan 22, 2024 · Court of Appeal Civil Division live hearings January 22, 2024 Fearn & others –v- The Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery 21 st – 22 nd January 2024 The Claimants brought a case of nuisance and under the Human Rights Act 1998 to protect their rights to privacy in their flats in central London. greer\u0027s country ham

Tom Weekes KC’S Post - LinkedIn

WebThe Tate denied that it was a public authority for the purposes of the HRA 1998, and, insofar as it was a hybrid public authority for the purposes of that Act, the Tate alleged that its … WebSeminar – Fearn and others v Tate Gallery case Landmark Chambers will be hosting a seminar on the recent judgment in the Fearn and others v Tate Gallery case on Wednesday 8 February 2024, 8.00am ... WebAs a result, ‘the Tate cannot rely on the principle of give and take and argue that it seeks no more toleration from its neighbours for its activities than they would expect the Tate to show for them’ (ibid). ... On what we can call the Physical Interference Limit (or ‘PIL v Fearn Fearn Fearn . v v ). on , is . focal length of diverging lenses