http://www.masscases.com/cases/app/45/45massappct637.html WebIt is, of course, the burden of an appellant to provide us with those portions of the record that support his claims on appeal. Arch Med. Assocs., Inc. v. Bartlett Health Enterprises, Inc., …
South African jurisprudence - Wikipedia
WebDecisions: Law Society's appeal was upheld unanimously Court maintained that "persons" meant males only This is an appeal case which means that the AD could have upheld the court a quo decision and could have maintained that the word "persons" included Wookey AD's reasoning (ratio decidendi) is important: 1. Webwomen to practise law since in the celebrated case of Incorporated Law Society v Wookey 1912 AD 623 Innes ACJ, Solomon J and De Villiers JP had held that the word 'persons' in s 20 of the Cape Charter ofJustice, regulating the admission ofattorneys in the Cape Province, included only male persons and thus the respondent package c state control
Transforming the judiciary: Notes from a continuing South …
WebIncorporated Law Society v. Wookey, 1912 AD 623 Appellant Division (Appêlant Afdeling) (1912) Employment discrimination, Gender discrimination. A firm of attorneys was willing to enroll Madeline Wookey as an articled clerk, but Wookey met with opposition from the Cape Law Society, which refused to register her articles. Wookey submitted an ... WebThe Law Society appealed this decision to the Appellate Division, arguing that Wookey could not be admitted as an attorney because she was a woman. The Appellate Division was … WebIncorporated Law Society v Wookey 1912. First case. Using S20 of Cape Charter of Justice. Whether the word "persons" is intended to include women or not. R v Detody 1926. Second case. Using Transvaal Ordinance S3 of 1902. Whether the word "all natives" is intended to include women. S2 - "all natives" S3 - explaining what that includes. package cache フォルダ 削除